
To program a great radio station, you must have many different components working together harmoniously. These components, when executed flawlessly, lead to success. The phrase “the sum of the parts” comes to mind.
That phrase can refer to a few different concepts. Generally, it refers to the total value or quantity of something when its individual components are combined. So it is with programming. It is possible to succeed by having overwhelming dominance in one content area, but that success is due to the weakness of your competitors more than your strength.
Much of the rhetoric around building a Programming Foundation is obvious. It should be common sense that you have to play the best music and more of it, have great on-air talent, great imaging, a dynamic presentation, fun contests, and targeted marketing that overwhelms the competition. It isn’t obvious. It’s talked about, referred to, considered and debated, and then executed at a level that is commensurate with the support received by those in leadership positions.
There aren’t a lot of secrets today, and the playing field is fairly equal radio station-to-radio station, but what’s rare is having the stomach to do what it takes to perform at a level that brings success.
There are many intangibles that play a role in achieving that success. The desire to win. The ability to lead and guide a team. A tireless commitment to the execution of the strategy or plan. Creating an environment that encourages talent to perform at their peak. Ingenuity in maximizing your resources when it comes to marketing and audience building. Remembering that content creation when supported with positive reinforcement leads to compelling attractive entertainment and information. These attributes should be commonplace. They aren’t. That’s one reason why those who employ companywide policies see varying results. Execution is critical.
MUSIC
Music selected for the station should be made with the sound and brand of your station in mind. Your music choices should be based on local callout (if you have it), the national picture that comes from following streaming airplay. That’s the 2025 equivalent of tracking sales decades ago. It means something. It is consumption. Look at Monday Morning Intel for regional research, and Mediabase for the monitoring of stations similar to your station. Music should be scheduled so that each quarter hour is representative of the format. Apply the theory of instant gratification. That is playing peoples favorite songs frequently. No one ever complains that you’re playing their favorite song too much. They complain about the songs that they do not like.
Variety is important. Platoon your library every 6 weeks. That is that your Power category songs stay on-air all the time, but regular and tertiary songs move in and out. That creates the illusion of variety. It freshens the station’s sound. Be sure to have an odd number of clocks that rotate songs so that the audience isn’t hearing the same songs every other day on their ride to or from work.
I’m a believer in having a consistent clock for an entire day, but change it up on each of the next two days. That way, you’re not putting a weaker quarter hour next to a similarly weak quarter hour.
The radio is no longer a place for music discovery by the masses. Some people hear songs for the first time on the radio, but that’s the exception these days and not the rule. Radio doesn’t expose hits, but it makes hits. Those hits come from repetition. There’s the conundrum of creating the feeling of Variety while delivering instant gratification. When you do play new music (new to your audience), identify the artist and mention the song title. That familiarity satisfies the audience’s curiosity. The identification of a song you’re playing for the 500th time doesn’t need the same level or frequency of identification, especially given the Smart Dash in most cars. The RDS or Quu does the heavy lifting for you.
I’ve always been a fan of using a tactic called “boxcar” when you segue two songs together. That is that you speak over the intro of the next song, and not over both the outro of the last song and the intro of the next. Talk over an outro when you are going into a commercial break. That’s how the audience has been trained for years. When a listener hears an air talent speak over an outro, it means “commercials are coming,” and they may leave. Speaking over the intro only is an unspoken message to the audience that you’re not stopping for commercials. That forward momentum tends to expand Time Spent Listening (TSL).
Music Specials (weekend programming or a one-time feature) are aired for two reasons: to move an audience to a specific time/daypart or to remind the audience that you’re still on-air in the fringe times.
You may not believe that it is worth it to promote a special or a weekend show by using valuable promo time, but smart marketers do exactly that. It makes the station multidimensional. The station may target At-Work listening Monday-Friday. All the more reason to promote what happens during the weekend. It signals that you’re on the air during the weekend, too.
Music Quantity is important. Long music sweeps. Fewer stopsets. The objective is to build time spent listening, but being known for long music sweeps can build your cume numbers, too. If a listener knows that you play the most music day-in-and-day-out, they’ll come back more frequently. We know that TSL (Time Spent Listening) is built by repeat tune-in. It’s not so much about sticking around, but coming back over and over again.
Where and when to schedule a long music sweep should be based on when you have the most listeners. Research shows us that the first and third quarter hours are usually the most listened to time windows. People start their activities at :00 and :30. In a diary market, the best place for a commercial break to start is :18 and :38. That ensures that you receive five (5) continuous minutes in a quarter hour. You want to cover the two biggest quarter-hours with music.
PPM markets are treated differently. You need only to have three (3) individual minutes of listening within a quarter hour in a PPM market. That’s why we stop across the quarter hours in PPM markets. Preferably :12-18 and :42-48. Although one can argue that being “the other guy” and moving across the top of the hour has value. Nielsen provides PPM and Diary Markets with tools to search for which hours have the most listening.
ON-AIR PERSONALITIES
Developing an emotional connection between your on-air personalities and listeners (without increasing the amount of talk) is an effective way of ingraining the station’s brand into the listener’s memory. On-air personalities need to be disciplined hosts who are providing relatable content to the target audience while keeping the music (or News/Talk – Sports/Talk conversation) moving. The more real you are, the better connection you’ll have with your audience. The very best talents are efficient in how much they talk. Efficiency is an important word. Efficiency is different than brevity. Brevity is “Weather today … Nice.” It doesn’t tell the listener anything. Efficiency is using only the number of words necessary to completely explain the thought in question.
The very best talent are amazing storytellers. They tell strong descriptive stories using visual words that paint a picture. They look for common experiences that they and their listeners have had, which makes them relatable, and should engage the listener’s interest. To tell a story in an efficient fashion, the talent needs to understand where they’re going with their story and how it ends. Meaning, before you start the journey, you need to plug the destination into your mental GPS. If you don’t know where you’re going, then any road will take you there.
We use a show prep system that is referred to as the Key Area System. The acronym is E/I/A/A/A. The letters stand for Emotion, Image, Area, Activity, and Artist.
- Emotion is what’s going on in the listener’s world while you’re on the air.
- Image is about the image of the radio station. Sell it to the listener in your own words and not as some trite slogan.
- Area is for what’s happening in your listening area.
- Activity is about the station’s activities.
- Artist is an element of artist information. For spoken word stations that element is about a newsmaker. Newsmakers are the Artist for News/Talk radio.
Watch this space next week for Part 2, where I’ll share secrets of imaging, syndication, and community involvement, with extra guidance for Talk formats.
This opening piece hits the mark: “music + talent” is the cornerstone of radio success.
Mike, I’m hoping you also talk about Format Discipline in Part II or in an upcoming article. The art of knowing what to play, and knowing what not to play, and why.
I listen up and down the dial during the day…and it’s “the battle of the machines” after 9 AM in most markets. Bad, overly compressed audio and music formats that try to cover 4 decades of music. Nearly unlistenable.
Great suggestion Bill. Thank you for the response. -M
For the record, when I read how you guys break down every minute of an hour into such careful thought and attention to every single detail and how it impacts the listening experience, it’s stunningly impressive. It also begs the question, “Why would anyone try to figure this all out on their own?” It’s like doing your own eye surgery to save money. Is the savings really worth the results you end up with? This is “highest level” programming expertise that takes decades to acquire and refine and you can turn it into “highest level” revenue immediately and continuously. This is not complex math. When a station hands you guys a bag of money, you give them about 10 bags of money in return…and that’s just the beginning. I’m a “C” student and even I can do the math on that trade. Keep up the great work!
Great insights in this piece, Mike! Your emphasis on harmonizing components like music selection, talent engagement, and strategic scheduling to build a compelling radio station is spot-on. I particularly appreciate the focus on balancing variety with instant gratification in music programming—platooning the library every 6 weeks is a clever way to keep the sound fresh while maintaining listener familiarity. The “boxcar” tactic for segues is a smart touch to sustain momentum and TSL. Your point about on-air personalities being efficient storytellers who connect emotionally without over-talking really resonates—relatability is key to audience loyalty. Looking forward to Part 2 for more on imaging and community engagement!
Piggybacking both on Mike’s column and Dave’s comment …
I believe there is hidden value in using three stops in diary markets, adding one around :50. If you split your overall spot load into three stops instead of two AND DON’T SAY ANYTHING ON THE AIR TO CALL LISTENERS’ ATTENTION TO IT, they will automatically sense fewer spots per stop and develop a mindset that you play fewer commercials than your competitors … and they will believe that even if you have the same number of minutes as the competition.
I would also suggest that an alternative to multiple clocks is to use the tools already in the music scheduling software. Taking MusicMaster as an example (guess what I use for The Eighties Channel™) I can set rules that force a song to play in two other dayparts before it can have a repeat in the original daypart, and it has to be offset by a couple of hours from its last play in that daypart. (With my powers, I also force it into a different quarter-hour than last time.) I’d rather use scheduling rules than have to maintain multiple similar clocks.
And one last piece of advice from here in the trenches: No one in programming is successful without having the instinct for the job. Trust that instinct when you have to make a judgment call … more than 90% of the time it will be correct.
P.S.: Dave, you don’t know how many times in my career I have clashed with sales managers about bonus spots, but you are correct, and I have usually either won those arguments by positioning it the way you do, or by telling them that the bonus spots just take up slots that we could be using for their NEXT client.
Now help me find a good argument against trade accounts!
K.M.
Sales departments can be full of some pretty sizable egos along with some folks who definitely didn’t sit in the front row at Harvard. It’s a recipe for LOTS of misunderstandings, including basic math, which is all this really is. Let’s “do the math” once more on this. Shall we?
Programming is like a painting created by a master artist.
Commercials are like stabbing that painting with a pair of scissors. (Am I going too fast?)
Would it make more sense to detract from the peaceful enjoyment of the painting by stabbing 8 scissor holes, or would it be inconsequential to stab 6 or 8 more holes into it?
Am I making the point? Let’s all agree: The fewer scissor holes, the better. They all detract from the enjoyment of the painting.
In reality, the average radio station sells about 65% of its inventory every week, which means they could literally do without 35% of that inventory (scissor holes) and never miss a dollar of revenue because they never sell it anyway. They could lose 35% of their units per hour and never miss them.
To feed the egos of managers at all levels, it’s become an obsession to charge higher and higher rates—which implies your station has some kind of superiority over the rest of the stations. In reality, those artificially high rates are often supported by lots of no charge spots. Are you really getting $950 per spot when you give away a free spot for every $950 spot you sell? Or, are you really selling all of those spots for an average of $475 per spot at the end of the day? That’s the MATH and it’s pretty simple.
Some “clever” sales manages like to bump out the no charge spots and run paid commercials for other clients in their place. This never goes over well with the clients who lose those no charge spots. In fact it’s a fast way to lose the client. Nevertheless, this goes on daily.
The moral of the story is leave your ego at home, take some night classes to brush up on basic math and simply charge fair market rates. Don’t ruin the painting more than you need to. Your “highest rate in the market” obsession is crushing your TSL, lowering your ratings and ultimately lowering your rates. You’re shooting your own foot off.
Running trade spots? Are you kidding? Trade companies are geniuses. They get a good rate and instead of paying cash, they give you some outdated clock radios and some unsold plasma TV’s (who has a plasma TV anymore?) for that inventory. Then, they turn around and sell YOUR inventory for about 5x or 10x what they “paid” you for it to some direct response companies. They make actual money and you get old, discontinued merchandise sitting in a warehouse somewhere in return. Those guys have my respect. They outsmart sales managers every day and it’s pure genius. When I was a sales manager, I rarely ran trade spots because I managed the inventory to sell for cash and I was paid on the cash total. I also kept my sell out in the high 90’s –not 65%. I sold spots for simply fair market rates and grew revenue every single quarter for 19 staright years. That’s 76 consecutive quarters. I think that’s long enough to say “the math works.” You’ll make more money this way.
I agree with a lot of what you said, Dave. I think there’s room for both of our POVs to co-exist.
I believe the best PDs are the ones that figure ways for the commercials to not have a negative impact on the programming. The easiest way is to construct the hot clock so the powers never get dropped for real-time correction as spot loads dictate. But the best SMs are the ones who realize that without the PD doing their job in that way, the product they are selling to the advertisers becomes flawed and therefore less effective for the client.
The “scissor hole” argument is a good one, and I would never try to go above three stops an hour these days. But the audience will notice the difference between two six-spot stops and three four-spot stops. I know, I know … we’re talking two minutes’ difference, tops. And I wouldn’t try that tactic in a PPM market unless I had incredibly weak competition in whatever format I was programming.
Audiences are more prone to notice how long it takes to get back to music than they are to how many times the music stopped. Combine those two factors and it’s no wonder that a lot of think we play too many commercials.
Like I said, a lot of what you are saying resonates well with me. But we have different roles. I have to figure out what the audience is thinking in order to accommodate the revenue, and you have to maximize the revenue for whatever amount of time in the hour that is feasible without driving listeners away.
We’re both doing a combination balancing and juggling act, just from different POVs.
Mike,
This isn’t a couple of pointers. This is more like a detailed architectural design to build a winning radio station today. And this is just part 1?
I wish you had consulted the stations that I sold commercials on in Chicago, Dallas and Los Angeles. Enough said.
Radio stations need to serve their listeners and their clients, but the pathway to become a GM has largely been through the sales department. The sales mindset can impact the decisions on the programming side—and not necessarily in a good way. For example, as you’ve said, there’s just too many commercials cluttering each hour today and it pushes listeners away. I agree. None of us loves to sit through a long stop set. It can be unbearable.
The truth is, plenty of that clutter is a bunch of “no charge” spots or “low charge” spots. Sometimes, it’s a bunch of PSA’s running to fill stop sets up that are already structured too long and will never get sold out to begin with. Not paying attention to this is short sighted. Listeners have commercial free choices now, so your stop sets need to be as short as possible today more than ever before. It’s an evolving marketplace, so you have to adjust your strategy and tactics along with it. This one is a no brainer.
This long stop set clutter issue is the result of obsessing about charging $400 per spot, then giving away an equal number of “no charge” spots to offset it when your market simply wants to pay $250 per spot. By simply charging $250 to begin with, you eliminate all of the extra no charge and low charge spots to offset your $400 rate and you make the station more listenable. Your order remains the exact same total amount, but uses half the inventory. You lose nothing, but you’ll gain a lot.
Using fewer spots and having shorter stop sets mean that your listeners will listen longer, your TSL will go up and you’ll soon be charging $300 per spot when the ratings tick up as a result. It’s a win, win, win.
The listeners have a better experience, the client’s spots stand out more and the sales people don’t have to beg anyone to buy their spots at twice the market rate…then get berated for not “believing” in the station enough if they lose a deal. Charging fair market rates to begin with means the orders close faster, the revenue grows more rapidly, and the overall customer experience is greatly enhanced as doing business with your station becomes a much more pleasant, seamless, frictionless experience that keeps them coming back for more.
I’m a “C” student and even I understand this. Thank you, Mike.
I suspect most of us are C students at best, Dave. 😉
Thank you for your kind words and for adding more to what I wrote. Loving the engagement and seeing how others brains work. -M